So, it's been a while. In my defense, someone I love had surgery and I almost lost my mind between that and midterms. No biggie. Reviews to come soon (note the lack of commitment about when? I thought it was pretty darn clever): Portal, Portal 2, "Belleville," Fast Five, and perhaps West Wing. This is assuming I don't watch or play anything better in the interim, of course. So, anyway... PEACE!
I love ya,
Caty
Friday, November 11, 2011
Sunday, October 23, 2011
"Uh Pitcher Of Ewe"
This is what I have to show for my Calculus class this week, a cartoon of my boyfriend. I am such a good student. I did, however, become privy to some excellent shows and I read a pretty darn good play. Reviews to come soon... not that you care. You know, that's the funny thing about this blog. No one reads it, and I don't really mind. I just pretend that people do anyway, for fun. Makes me feel important without getting too big of a head. I dunno, I'm rambling. It's 5AM now, so I think I'll hit the hay. I am a bit tired. Anyway, I love you all, regardless of whether or not you read my blog.
Love,
Caty
P.S. "I cannot believe my eyes; is the world finally growing wise? And I think I see some kind of harmony is on the rise."
Monday, October 17, 2011
"We are FAMILY"
I've been a little behind in my blogging lately. I'm afraid I've just been spending a lot of time doing homework and spending time with the awesome people in my dorm. That's really all I've got to say right now; I'm too busy living it up here. I'll make an effort to post some stuff soon, though!
Wednesday, October 5, 2011
"Lately, I've Been Thinking"
This post is a few day later than I promised, but in my defense I'm working on a show. So without further adieu, here's my review of Anton Chekhov's Three Sisters. It's a little muddled, since I'm basically copying and pasting from my report on the play, but I think it gets the points across.
Exposition:
Where I come from, in South-Central Alaska, we don’t have professional theatre. Since Three Sisters was my first time watching “real theatre,” I may be a bit generous in my review. Quite frankly, I was amazed. Anton Chekhov’s ability to mesh humor and tragedy is beautiful, and presents a more realistic view of life. The way he writes also lends to the major theme of the play, which is that life simply is. It sounds like I’m leaving part of the sentence out, but I assure you I am not. Life is hard, happy, sad, wonderful, terrifying, lovely, disillusioning… Life is.
Summary:
The basic plot of the story involves the lives of (you guessed it) three sisters. The play begins on the youngest sister Irina’s birthday, which is also the first anniversary of their father’s death. Irina is full of hope and ambition, desiring to enter the workforce and make something of herself. She dresses in white throughout the entire play to denote her innocence and purity. The middle sister, Masha, always wears black and is wedded to a husband she does not care for; she longs for a life with more meaning and more interesting people. The oldest sister, Olga, seems to be the most balanced of the three, but there is a sense that she feels a lack of purpose as well. She is constantly tired and only seems rejuvenated when her sisters are happy. The sisters desire two things: for their brother and head of the household, Andrei, to realize his intellectual potential and become a professor, and to move to Moscow when he does. To their dismay, he has fallen into the clingy arms of one Natasha. To add to the plot is a group of military men. They are Chebutykin, the aging doctor who dotes on the three sisters (especially Irina); the wealthy , well-balanced, and wistful Tuzenbach, who is also referred to as the Baron (he is in love with Irina); Vershinin the philosopher, who is married to a woman depicted as horrible and crazy and eventually falls in love with Masha; Solyony, who is borderline insane (possibly as a result of immense insecurity), is in love with Irina, and can be counted on to say something ridiculous at any given time; Rode; and Fedotik. Other characters include three servants at the household (a very old couple and a young girl), and Masha’s husband Ferapont.
In the second scene, Andrei disappoints his sister by settling down with Natasha, who becomes more and more antagonistic and abrasive as the show goes on. Andrei also begins gambling away large sums of money and losing sight of his intellectual prowess. Irina loses faith in work and becomes discouraged by her unwanted suitor, Solyony. She does not mind the Baron. Vershinin and Masha become very close and it becomes obvious that they are in love. The only thing keeping them apart is Masha’s husband (who, ironically, later mentions that he might like to be wedded to Olga instead). Everyone seems a little tired and on edge, as though none have them have had quite enough sleep. It is snowing outside during this scene (which was a wonderful production effect), which adds not only realism, but a sense of heaviness as well. The sisters still haven’t made it to Moscow and feel blanketed in, as if by snow.
In the third scene, there has been a large fire. Through the windows on the balcony the trees can be seen in dim red light, which later turns to smoky haze. The action takes place in a much smaller room, to make the audience see how little is left to the sisters and to show how trapped they feel. Everyone is exhausted and appears to have lost hope. Most of the men are grimy with ash and everything about the scene has a kind of darkness to it. Masha and Vershinin finally cannot ignore each other and consummate their love. It is the only part of the scene that could be described as happy. The doctor tries to commit suicide by drowning, Irina breaks down, Olga becomes entirely fed up with Natasha’s lack of compassion, and Andrei realizes the horror of what he has done to his beloved sisters by gambling so much away and marrying too hastily to such an overbearing woman. It is realized that the sisters will never go to Moscow. In her despair, Irina decides to marry the Baron.
The fourth scene contrasts the previous one in its brightness and its openness. It takes place on the porch. The military men are leaving, but the Baron has retired and is marrying Irina. Andrei has lost all of his spark. Olga has moved out and is headmistress at the school. Masha and Vershinin have say their heart-wrenching goodbyes. Olga and Irina do their best to console her, but Irina is additionally heartbroken when she hears that the Baron was killed by Solyony in a duel. Natasha is borderline insane, treating the misplacement of a fork as though it were the end of the world. Despite all of this turmoil, hope shines through, however. Irina still plans to make a new start by moving and finding work. She is a bit jaded, but has returned to her original state of optimism. Olga sees that she can find joy without her sisters, helping children learn as a headmistress and assisting the elderly woman that used to serve the sisters. Masha has seen that there are people worth taking note of in the world and knows that there is joy out there. Her husband takes her back as though nothing has happened, and she finally seems to accept him, saying “Let’s go home.” It is the day most filled with tragedy in the entire play, but is the beginning of a new chapter for the sisters. Even though life seems bad, it looks bright. And that is how life is.
Thoughts That I Brought Away:
To begin a review like this, the stage must first be set. The set pieces in this play were glorious. There were multiple levels (a main floor, an upper dining room, and a balcony). At times the middle and upper levels were removed, but their presence added a certain dynamic effect, causing one’s eyes to be constantly entertained and making the play appear less flat visually. The changes between sets were also brilliant and seamless as the action moved through different parts of the sisters’ household. Possibly my favorite part about the set, though, was the spindly birch trees that could be seen through the windows. They seemed to travel up into the rafters and go on forever. They were like a representation of life, just going on and on and on. The use of a large wooden platform also helped to denote when a character was inside the house or out, and its gentle creaks added an additional touch of realism. It made it much easier to imagine being in a characters position, pacing over the wooden panels to slump onto a nearby chair.
Speaking of chairs, the furniture as well as all other set pieces and props were perfectly time period and seemed to fit in each scene like a glove. The only furniture piece I was confused by was an end- table which had its legs folded out onstage. I wasn’t entirely sure if that was time period. At any rate, it was very minor and the only even potential flaw I saw as far as production was concerned.
To continue with the spacial description, the actual theatre itself was wonderful. The chairs were comfortable, but not so soft that as to tempt a patron to slumber. And the arrangement of the seats was at a steeper incline than I was accustomed to, which made me feel much closer to the actors. It also meant that the projection of voice didn’t need to be as much of a concern. The acoustics also added to this. I heard every word that every actor spoke. For someone a bit hard of hearing in the balcony, it is a highly appreciated quality.
Now, the topic I have saved for last is the acting. I have never been so moved by a performance. These men and women actually sobbed at points. And this wasn’t your typical stage boo-hooing. These were actual throes of grief. This was counterpointed by the amazing ability of the actors to portray levity in other scenes. The only things that I noticed that might have been a bit off were in Olga and Natasha’s performances. Olga speaks the first lines in the play. That is a lot of pressure, and should thus be met with a large amount of skill and polish. Unfortunately, Olga’s opening lines seemed a little too polished to me. It’s a nuance, and I’m something of a critic for even mentioning it. As for Natasha, her performance was stellar and she delivered almost as many laugh lines as Solyony. Just a few times, though, she stepped on the audience’s laughter. It’s a very hard skill to master, gauging the audience’s giggles, and her acting more than made up for it. Her character is a subject of pity at the beginning and an embodiment of evil by the ending.
It’s difficult to explain the intricacies of the performances to someone. They were so good, so involved, that I found myself drawn into the action as I never have been before. I am still blown away.
In Conclusion:
Anton Chekhov is a genius, and his work Three Sisters has been reproduced beautifully. The acting, lights, sets, and translation were blended perfectly. In general, I’m not a fan dramas because I found them depressing and overbearing. But his use of humor throughout hard times is more attractive and realistic than most dramas. The crazy ups and downs, the trials and hardships, and the hopes and disheartenings of life are all part of this play. It’s all the same. Life is.
I loved this play, and I recommend it. Even the discrepencies that we discussed in my class today were so minor and subjective that they hardly count. It was good theatre, straight up.
I hope all of you are doing well and enjoying the beginning of October. I love pumpkin flavoring and Halloween, so I that I am! It's going to be a great month.
Love,
Caty
Exposition:
Where I come from, in South-Central Alaska, we don’t have professional theatre. Since Three Sisters was my first time watching “real theatre,” I may be a bit generous in my review. Quite frankly, I was amazed. Anton Chekhov’s ability to mesh humor and tragedy is beautiful, and presents a more realistic view of life. The way he writes also lends to the major theme of the play, which is that life simply is. It sounds like I’m leaving part of the sentence out, but I assure you I am not. Life is hard, happy, sad, wonderful, terrifying, lovely, disillusioning… Life is.
Summary:
The basic plot of the story involves the lives of (you guessed it) three sisters. The play begins on the youngest sister Irina’s birthday, which is also the first anniversary of their father’s death. Irina is full of hope and ambition, desiring to enter the workforce and make something of herself. She dresses in white throughout the entire play to denote her innocence and purity. The middle sister, Masha, always wears black and is wedded to a husband she does not care for; she longs for a life with more meaning and more interesting people. The oldest sister, Olga, seems to be the most balanced of the three, but there is a sense that she feels a lack of purpose as well. She is constantly tired and only seems rejuvenated when her sisters are happy. The sisters desire two things: for their brother and head of the household, Andrei, to realize his intellectual potential and become a professor, and to move to Moscow when he does. To their dismay, he has fallen into the clingy arms of one Natasha. To add to the plot is a group of military men. They are Chebutykin, the aging doctor who dotes on the three sisters (especially Irina); the wealthy , well-balanced, and wistful Tuzenbach, who is also referred to as the Baron (he is in love with Irina); Vershinin the philosopher, who is married to a woman depicted as horrible and crazy and eventually falls in love with Masha; Solyony, who is borderline insane (possibly as a result of immense insecurity), is in love with Irina, and can be counted on to say something ridiculous at any given time; Rode; and Fedotik. Other characters include three servants at the household (a very old couple and a young girl), and Masha’s husband Ferapont.
In the second scene, Andrei disappoints his sister by settling down with Natasha, who becomes more and more antagonistic and abrasive as the show goes on. Andrei also begins gambling away large sums of money and losing sight of his intellectual prowess. Irina loses faith in work and becomes discouraged by her unwanted suitor, Solyony. She does not mind the Baron. Vershinin and Masha become very close and it becomes obvious that they are in love. The only thing keeping them apart is Masha’s husband (who, ironically, later mentions that he might like to be wedded to Olga instead). Everyone seems a little tired and on edge, as though none have them have had quite enough sleep. It is snowing outside during this scene (which was a wonderful production effect), which adds not only realism, but a sense of heaviness as well. The sisters still haven’t made it to Moscow and feel blanketed in, as if by snow.
In the third scene, there has been a large fire. Through the windows on the balcony the trees can be seen in dim red light, which later turns to smoky haze. The action takes place in a much smaller room, to make the audience see how little is left to the sisters and to show how trapped they feel. Everyone is exhausted and appears to have lost hope. Most of the men are grimy with ash and everything about the scene has a kind of darkness to it. Masha and Vershinin finally cannot ignore each other and consummate their love. It is the only part of the scene that could be described as happy. The doctor tries to commit suicide by drowning, Irina breaks down, Olga becomes entirely fed up with Natasha’s lack of compassion, and Andrei realizes the horror of what he has done to his beloved sisters by gambling so much away and marrying too hastily to such an overbearing woman. It is realized that the sisters will never go to Moscow. In her despair, Irina decides to marry the Baron.
The fourth scene contrasts the previous one in its brightness and its openness. It takes place on the porch. The military men are leaving, but the Baron has retired and is marrying Irina. Andrei has lost all of his spark. Olga has moved out and is headmistress at the school. Masha and Vershinin have say their heart-wrenching goodbyes. Olga and Irina do their best to console her, but Irina is additionally heartbroken when she hears that the Baron was killed by Solyony in a duel. Natasha is borderline insane, treating the misplacement of a fork as though it were the end of the world. Despite all of this turmoil, hope shines through, however. Irina still plans to make a new start by moving and finding work. She is a bit jaded, but has returned to her original state of optimism. Olga sees that she can find joy without her sisters, helping children learn as a headmistress and assisting the elderly woman that used to serve the sisters. Masha has seen that there are people worth taking note of in the world and knows that there is joy out there. Her husband takes her back as though nothing has happened, and she finally seems to accept him, saying “Let’s go home.” It is the day most filled with tragedy in the entire play, but is the beginning of a new chapter for the sisters. Even though life seems bad, it looks bright. And that is how life is.
Thoughts That I Brought Away:
To begin a review like this, the stage must first be set. The set pieces in this play were glorious. There were multiple levels (a main floor, an upper dining room, and a balcony). At times the middle and upper levels were removed, but their presence added a certain dynamic effect, causing one’s eyes to be constantly entertained and making the play appear less flat visually. The changes between sets were also brilliant and seamless as the action moved through different parts of the sisters’ household. Possibly my favorite part about the set, though, was the spindly birch trees that could be seen through the windows. They seemed to travel up into the rafters and go on forever. They were like a representation of life, just going on and on and on. The use of a large wooden platform also helped to denote when a character was inside the house or out, and its gentle creaks added an additional touch of realism. It made it much easier to imagine being in a characters position, pacing over the wooden panels to slump onto a nearby chair.
Speaking of chairs, the furniture as well as all other set pieces and props were perfectly time period and seemed to fit in each scene like a glove. The only furniture piece I was confused by was an end- table which had its legs folded out onstage. I wasn’t entirely sure if that was time period. At any rate, it was very minor and the only even potential flaw I saw as far as production was concerned.
To continue with the spacial description, the actual theatre itself was wonderful. The chairs were comfortable, but not so soft that as to tempt a patron to slumber. And the arrangement of the seats was at a steeper incline than I was accustomed to, which made me feel much closer to the actors. It also meant that the projection of voice didn’t need to be as much of a concern. The acoustics also added to this. I heard every word that every actor spoke. For someone a bit hard of hearing in the balcony, it is a highly appreciated quality.
Now, the topic I have saved for last is the acting. I have never been so moved by a performance. These men and women actually sobbed at points. And this wasn’t your typical stage boo-hooing. These were actual throes of grief. This was counterpointed by the amazing ability of the actors to portray levity in other scenes. The only things that I noticed that might have been a bit off were in Olga and Natasha’s performances. Olga speaks the first lines in the play. That is a lot of pressure, and should thus be met with a large amount of skill and polish. Unfortunately, Olga’s opening lines seemed a little too polished to me. It’s a nuance, and I’m something of a critic for even mentioning it. As for Natasha, her performance was stellar and she delivered almost as many laugh lines as Solyony. Just a few times, though, she stepped on the audience’s laughter. It’s a very hard skill to master, gauging the audience’s giggles, and her acting more than made up for it. Her character is a subject of pity at the beginning and an embodiment of evil by the ending.
It’s difficult to explain the intricacies of the performances to someone. They were so good, so involved, that I found myself drawn into the action as I never have been before. I am still blown away.
In Conclusion:
Anton Chekhov is a genius, and his work Three Sisters has been reproduced beautifully. The acting, lights, sets, and translation were blended perfectly. In general, I’m not a fan dramas because I found them depressing and overbearing. But his use of humor throughout hard times is more attractive and realistic than most dramas. The crazy ups and downs, the trials and hardships, and the hopes and disheartenings of life are all part of this play. It’s all the same. Life is.
I loved this play, and I recommend it. Even the discrepencies that we discussed in my class today were so minor and subjective that they hardly count. It was good theatre, straight up.
I hope all of you are doing well and enjoying the beginning of October. I love pumpkin flavoring and Halloween, so I that I am! It's going to be a great month.
Love,
Caty
Tuesday, September 27, 2011
"A Group Of Female Siblings Numbering To Three"
Okay... this is not going to be a real post today. It's more of a... pre-post warning (which sounds kind of oxymoronic). Basically, I'm going to go see Anton Chekhov's play "Three Sisters" this weekend at the Yale Rep. and I am REALLY EXCITED. You can probably expect a review by Sunday.
I hope that all of your weekends look as promising as mine!
Love,
Caty
P.S. Chekhov is the man. Even if he did call "The Seagull" a "comedy"
I hope that all of your weekends look as promising as mine!
Love,
Caty
P.S. Chekhov is the man. Even if he did call "The Seagull" a "comedy"
Saturday, September 24, 2011
"A 'Rushin' Play And Tales of Family Angst"
Well... I can't think of anything interesting to say about what's going on in my life right now that hasn't been said before. So I'll just say that Procrastination is a life choice, and I have chosen it. As a result, I can write a pretty decent paper in under an hour. I probably shouldn't push my procrastination skills too much, though. Anyway, I've read two reasonably famous plays lately, and I'm going to tell you about them both.
Instead of reviewing one thing at time, like I normally do, I'm going to switch it up by doing a little compare and contrast of the play "Buried Child" by Sam Shepard and "The Seagull" by Anton Chekhov. Both plays concerned dysfunctional family relations. "Buried Child" took place in rural Illinois and "The Seagull" took place in Russia (I really just don't know where) on an estate by a lake. Shepard explored such things as personal identity vs. family inheritance, incestuous relationships, and the dynamics of a broken family. "The Seagull" also had an element of familial issues because of a rather complex Love Square (even more deadly than the feared Love Triangle!). There is very professional visualization below:
Perhaps my favorite part about both of these plays, though, was the way they mixed tragedy with comedy. For "Buried Child" it was the way the family communicated with each other (through slander and leg-pulling), and for Chekhov it was the complexities of everyday life as well as a light kind of tone.
To be completely honest, I HATED "Buried Child" the first time I read it. I didn't agree with one of the main themes and I thought it was just too dark. Upon re-reading it I liked it, though. I think that this is because by the time I got to the end of the play I forgot all of the comedy in the beginning. As for "The Seagull," I liked it. I just don't think it should be called a "Comedy," no matter how ironic it is. If you read it/have read it, you will know what I mean.
I was going to do a much more in-depth compare and contrast, but I seem to have lost some motivation. I do, after all, have Devo blasting and another play to read ("Golden Boy"). I will leave you with the most frustrating and most enjoyable parts of each play.
"Buried Child": Very ambiguous about a great deal of things, but has some very funny moments and allows for a lot of individual interpretation.
"The Seagull": All of the characters have 3 names (which makes it VERY DIFFICULT to read effectively), but was written beautifully (could be one of my favorite plays, even if it is NOT a comedy).
Other than read plays, all I've done is watch "The Princess & The Frog" (which I love). It's set in the '30s, has Jazz music composed by Randy Newman, and is a classically drawn Disney movie. I think that there is no way this movie couldn't be awesome. But then again, I like Disney movies...
So, anyway, I have some Calculus homework to punch in the face and some Dunkin' Donuts coffee to drink. I bid you adieu and hope that wherever you may be in life and in the world, you have a great day.
Love,
Caty
Instead of reviewing one thing at time, like I normally do, I'm going to switch it up by doing a little compare and contrast of the play "Buried Child" by Sam Shepard and "The Seagull" by Anton Chekhov. Both plays concerned dysfunctional family relations. "Buried Child" took place in rural Illinois and "The Seagull" took place in Russia (I really just don't know where) on an estate by a lake. Shepard explored such things as personal identity vs. family inheritance, incestuous relationships, and the dynamics of a broken family. "The Seagull" also had an element of familial issues because of a rather complex Love Square (even more deadly than the feared Love Triangle!). There is very professional visualization below:
To be completely honest, I HATED "Buried Child" the first time I read it. I didn't agree with one of the main themes and I thought it was just too dark. Upon re-reading it I liked it, though. I think that this is because by the time I got to the end of the play I forgot all of the comedy in the beginning. As for "The Seagull," I liked it. I just don't think it should be called a "Comedy," no matter how ironic it is. If you read it/have read it, you will know what I mean.
I was going to do a much more in-depth compare and contrast, but I seem to have lost some motivation. I do, after all, have Devo blasting and another play to read ("Golden Boy"). I will leave you with the most frustrating and most enjoyable parts of each play.
"Buried Child": Very ambiguous about a great deal of things, but has some very funny moments and allows for a lot of individual interpretation.
"The Seagull": All of the characters have 3 names (which makes it VERY DIFFICULT to read effectively), but was written beautifully (could be one of my favorite plays, even if it is NOT a comedy).
Other than read plays, all I've done is watch "The Princess & The Frog" (which I love). It's set in the '30s, has Jazz music composed by Randy Newman, and is a classically drawn Disney movie. I think that there is no way this movie couldn't be awesome. But then again, I like Disney movies...
So, anyway, I have some Calculus homework to punch in the face and some Dunkin' Donuts coffee to drink. I bid you adieu and hope that wherever you may be in life and in the world, you have a great day.
Love,
Caty
Thursday, September 15, 2011
"The Unusual Suspects"
College is... not too shabby! I've made a few more friends, and am starting to feel like I actually live here. Saw some Alaskans this past weekend, which was awesome, went to NYC (AMAZING), and just generally had a decent week. But enough about me, what of my reviews that I know you're all just DYING to read?! Well, I've got a few, so don't worry.
A truly wonderful film that I watched was "The Usual Suspects." Kevin Spacey is the actor I want to be some day. He's so amazing! The plot twist was one I would normally catch, but he fooled me. I don't want to give anything away, so I can't really say much besides "watch the movie!"
Another goodie that I rewatched lately was "Julie & Julia." Frankly... it's a chick-flick (though I did get my brother to watch it and he enjoyed it!). It's very cute and creative. Amy Adams is one of my very favorite actresses. If you're looking for a lot of depth, look elsewhere. However, this flick has more to offer than some lame kiss-kiss movie. It's good. Watch it... if you like chick flicks, anyway.
I really can't think of any other movies right now. I've been too busy for them lately! Anyway, stay classy, have a great day.
Love,
Caty
A truly wonderful film that I watched was "The Usual Suspects." Kevin Spacey is the actor I want to be some day. He's so amazing! The plot twist was one I would normally catch, but he fooled me. I don't want to give anything away, so I can't really say much besides "watch the movie!"
Another goodie that I rewatched lately was "Julie & Julia." Frankly... it's a chick-flick (though I did get my brother to watch it and he enjoyed it!). It's very cute and creative. Amy Adams is one of my very favorite actresses. If you're looking for a lot of depth, look elsewhere. However, this flick has more to offer than some lame kiss-kiss movie. It's good. Watch it... if you like chick flicks, anyway.
I really can't think of any other movies right now. I've been too busy for them lately! Anyway, stay classy, have a great day.
Love,
Caty
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)